Summary of Recommendations
- We recommend that the States should develop a citizen friendly GIS based property tax IT system for efficient enumeration, assessment and collection of property tax. (paragraph 10.67)
- We recommend extending the Urban Data platform's capabilities to support ULBs in preparing accounts and financial reports. (paragraph 10.71)
- The existing arrangements for Technical Guidance and Supervision by the CAG should be continued and strengthened to improve the quality of audit and accounts of local bodies in the States. State Governments should augment the capabilities of their Local Fund Audit Departments (LFADs) by investing in skill development and addressing manpower shortages. (paragraph 10.74)
- The States should transparently report all transfers to local bodies, including those from the Consolidated Fund of India on the recommendation of the Finance Commission, transfers under centrally sponsored schemes, State Finance Commission grants and other grants from the State Government, separately for ULBs and RLBs in their budgets. These transfers, with all their components, should also be reported in Appendix III of the State Finance Accounts. (paragraph 10.78)
- In Articles 280(3)(bb) and 280(3)(c), the Constitution directs the FC to make its recommendations on RLBs and ULBs ‘on the basis of the recommendations made by the Finance Commission of the States.’ We recommend that the above‑quoted expression be dropped from the relevant articles through a Constitutional amendment. (paragraph 10.81)
- We recommend that NITI Aayog may study the functioning of SFCs across States and may publish a compendium of the good practices of the SFCs for the reference of all the States. (paragraph 10.81)
- We recommend that the grants for RLBs be classified into basic and performance components and the grants for ULBs be classified into basic, performance, urban infrastructure and urbanisation premium components. The aggregate national grant allocation for basic and performance components, put together has been divided in the ratio of 60:40 between RLBs and ULBs. Inter se, the division between basic and performance components is recommended in the ratio of 80:20 for both RLBs and ULBs. (paragraphs 10.83 and 10.84)
- A total allocation of ₹7,91,493 crore as grants recommended for duly constituted RLBs and ULBs for our award period spanning from 2026‑27 to 2030‑31. (paragraph 10.84)
- For RLBs, inter‑State distribution is based on a 90:10 ratio of projected rural population (2026) and area, respectively. For ULBs, the States' share has been determined by a 90:10 ratio of projected urban population (2026) and the OSR of ULBs, respectively. (paragraphs 10.86 and 10.89)
- Within each State, the distribution of grants to duly constituted RLBs of all tiers and to duly constituted ULBs may be undertaken as per the latest accepted recommendations of the respective SFCs. In the absence of the SFC’s recommendations, the tier wise distribution to RLBs may be in conformity with the prescribed percentages. Within a tier of RLB, the distribution may be as per the latest accepted SFC recommendations or in the absence of SFC recommendations based on population and area in the ratio 90:10. For ULBs, the distribution may be as per the latest accepted SFCs recommendations or in the absence of SFC’s recommendations, based on urban population and OSR of ULBs in the 90:10 ratio. (paragraphs 10.87, 10.88 and 10.90)
- The concerned State Government shall make allocations for exempted areas on par with the Commission’s recommendations with respect to local bodies. (paragraph 10.91)
- There should be a duly constituted body in place as required in Part IX and Part IX‑A of the Constitution to claim local body grants. This would be the first entry level condition. (paragraph 10.92)
- Online availability in public domain in year T of audited accounts for all ULBs and RLBs of a State for the T‑2 fiscal year and provisional accounts for the T‑1 year would be the second entry‑level condition to avail local body grants for the year T. (paragraph 10.93)
- All States must comply with the Constitutional provisions pertaining to the regular constitution of SFCs due as per the Constitutional provision, that is, on expiry of five years of constitution of previous SFC and ensure laying of ATRs in the State legislature within 6 months of submission of the SFC report as a prerequisite to claim their local body grant. This would be the third entry level condition to claim local body grants from the first year of the award period, that is from 2026‑27.
(paragraph 10.95)
Chapter 10
- The ULB and RLB grant has been divided into basic (80 per cent) and performance (20 per cent) components, with the latter divided into two equal halves: RLB/ULB performance component and State performance component. The basic component may be made available to the States upon fulfilment of the three entry‑level (eligibility) conditions. (paragraph 10.96)
- For Gram Panchayats to receive the RLB performance component of the RLB grant in fiscal year T, we recommend that Gram Panchayats raise, in year T‑1, minimum 1.025 times its OSR in year T‑2 or 2.5 per cent per annum compounded growth applied over OSR of 2025‑26, whichever is lower, subject to a minimum amount of ₹1200 per household per annum. This will be applicable from the third year of the award period, that is, 2028-29 onwards. (paragraph 10.97)
- For Block Panchayats, we recommend that they qualify for the RLB performance component of the RLB grant if 75 per cent of Gram Panchayats within their jurisdiction qualify for it. For District Panchayats, we recommend that to qualify for the grant in year T, District Panchayats raise, in year T‑1, minimum 1.025 times its OSR in year T‑2 or 2.5 per cent per annum compounded growth applied over OSR of 2025‑26, whichever is lower. Both of these will be applicable from the third year of the award period, that is, 2028-29 onwards. (paragraph 10.98)
- For ULBs to qualify for the ULB performance component grant in year T, we recommend it raise in year T‑1, minimum 1.05 times its OSR in year T‑2 or 5 per cent per annum compounded growth applied over OSR of 2025‑26, whichever is lower. This will be applicable from the second year of the award period, that is, 2027-28 onwards. (paragraph 10.99)
- We recommend that the release of State performance components of the RLB and ULB grants in year T be contingent upon the State transferring from its own resources, in the year T‑1, grants to local bodies amounting to 20 per cent or more of the basic FC grant recommended by us for the year T‑1, starting from the second year. (paragraph 10.100)
- If any of the performance conditionalities goes unfulfilled, the undisbursed portion of a State's local body performance grants would be disbursed according to the prescribed methodology. (paragraph 10.101)
- Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and Ministry of Panchayati Raj can work towards conceptualising and rolling out a Learning Management System for the functionaries and staff of local bodies so that the functionaries in the local bodies are geared up to meet the present‑day challenges. (paragraph 10.103)
- 50 per cent of the basic component should be tied and the remaining 50 per cent of the basic component and the entire performance components should remain untied. The tied component should be directed towards ‘Sanitation and Solid Waste Management’ and/or ‘Water Management’. (paragraph 10.107)
- We recommend that no local body should be allowed to spend more than 20 per cent of the untied allocation on the construction and maintenance of roads. Moreover, the untied grants should not be used for the payment of salaries or other establishment‑related expenditure. (paragraph 10.109)
- The practice of publishing Service Level Benchmarks should be continued and extended to all ULBs along with introduction of a third‑party assessment or audit mechanism in the system to enhance the reliability of the self‑reported figures. (paragraph 10.110)
- MoPR and MoHUA should organize regional workshops to familiarize States with the Commission’s recommendations, the operational guidelines, the modalities to be followed for compliance and the process of claiming grants, with special focus on the North-Eastern States. (paragraph 10.111)
- The total quantum of urbanisation premium, for incentivising rural to urban transitions, to be ₹10,000 crore for the complete award period with a fixed per capita one‑time eligibility amount to be ₹2,000 per person (based on Census 2011 population). The release of urbanisation premium component should be claimed by the State on mergers of peri‑urban villages into adjoining larger ULB with existing population not less than One lakh and formulation of an appropriate Rural to Urban transition policy. (paragraphs 10.113 and 10.114)
- A Special Infrastructure Component for selected ULBs with the outlay of ₹56,100 crore to facilitate decisive intervention in comprehensive wastewater management in urban growth centres. (paragraph 10.117) Chapter 10
- The local body grants shall continue to be released in minimum two equal instalments each year, consistent with the existing practice and subject to the fulfilment of the conditions stipulated by the Commission. (paragraph 10.121)
- The Union Government should ensure that where a set of local bodies within the State meet the conditions, the grants due to them are released without waiting for the rest. (paragraph 10.122)
- State Governments should ensure the transfer of the grants‑in‑aid to their respective local bodies within ten working days of their receipt from the Union Government. Any delay in this transfer beyond the stipulated ten working days shall obligate the State Governments to release the funds along with interest, calculated at the effective rate of interest applicable to market borrowings/State Development Loans for the preceding financial year. (paragraph 10.123)
- No further conditions, other than those explicitly indicated in this chapter, should be imposed either by the Union Government or the State Governments for the release of local body grants to the ULBs and RLBs. (paragraph 10.124)