Menu

        To Read Rera Act, 2016, select Muncipal related, scroll down and select RERA Act

Saturday, April 23, 2022

Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Rules, 2020

Unable to view correctly please click above link
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 31st December, 2020

G.S.R. 818(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (z) of subsection (2) of section 176 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 36 of 2003), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:-

1.  Short title and commencement.-
  1. These rules may be called the Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Rules, 2020.
  2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2.  Definitions.-
  1. In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,-
    1. Act means the Electricity Act, 2003;
    2. applicant means an owner or occupier of any premises who files an application form with a distribution licensee for supply of electricity, increase or decrease in sanctioned load or contract demand, change in title or mutation of name, change in consumer category, disconnection or restoration of supply, or termination of agreement, shifting of connection or other services as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, rules and regulations made thereunder;
    3. application means an application form complete in all respects in the appropriate format, as specified by the Commission, along with documents and other compliances;
    4. billing cycle or billing period means the period for which regular electricity bills as specified by the Commission, are issued for different categories of consumers by the distribution licensee;
    5. Commission means the State Electricity Regulatory Commission constituted under section 82 of the Act;
    6. Consumer means any person who is supplied with electricity for his own use by a distribution licensee or the Government or by any other person engaged in the business of supplying electricity to the public under the Electricity Act, 2003 or any other law for the time being in force and includes any person whose premises are for the time being connected for the purpose of receiving electricity with the works of a distribution licensee, the Government or such other person, as the case may be;
    7. days means clear working days;
    8. disconnection means the physical separation or remote disconnection of a consumer from the distribution system of the distribution licensee;
    9. fixed charges has the same meaning as per the provisions of the prevailing Tariff Order issued for the distribution licensee by the Commission;
    10. maximum demand means the highest load measured in average kVA or kW at the point of supply of a consumer during any consecutive period of thirty minutes or as specified by the Commission, during the billing period;
    11. occupier means the owner, tenant or person in occupation of the premises where electricity is used or proposed to be used;
    12. point of supply means the point, as may be specified by the State Commission, at which a consumer is supplied electricity;
    13. prosumer means a person who consumes electricity from the grid and can also inject electricity into the grid for distribution licensee, using same point of supply;
    14. temporary connection means an electricity connection required by a person for meeting his temporary needs such as-
      1. for construction of residential, commercial and industrial complexes including pumps for dewatering;
      2. for illumination during festivals and family functions;
      3. for threshers or other such machinery excluding agriculture pump sets;
      4. for touring cinemas, theatres, circuses, fairs, exhibitions, melas or congregations.
    15. unauthorised use of electricity has the meaning as assigned to it under section 126 of the Act.
  2. The words and expressions used and not defined in these rules but defined in the Act shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Act and in absence thereof, the meanings as commonly understood in the electricity supply industry.
Contd.Page.2
 Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Posted by at 10 comments:

Saturday, February 26, 2022

Adoption of overhead Charges in works

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
ABSTRACT


P.R. & R.D. DEPARTMENT – Road and Bridge works – Adoption of overhead Charges and Contractors profit for Road and Bridge works taken up in P.R. & R.D. Department and allowing of tender premium in respect of works for which MORD specifications adopted – Permission – Accorded – Orders – Issued.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PROGS.II) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No.57
Dated: 19-2-2008.

Read the following:
  1. G.O.Ms.No.141,T.R. & B. Department, dt.27.7.2006.
  2. G.O.Ms.No.230,T.R. & B Department, dt.13.8.2007.
  3. From the E-in-C(P.R.),Hyderabad lr.No.T1/29042/96, dt.17.11.2006.
  4. G.O.Ms.No.122,P.R. & R.D.(Progs.II)Dept.,dt.30.3.2007.
  5. Govt.Memo.No.8887/Progs.II(2)/07,dt.8.5.2007.
-:O:-
O R D E R:

  In the references 1st and 2nd read above TR&B Department have accorded permission adopting 20% overhead charges, contractors profit and allowing 5% tender premium in respect of works for which the Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (MORTH) specifications are adopted for all Road and Bridge works.

2.  In the reference 3rd read above, the E-in-C(P.R.) has requested the Government to issue orders for adopting contractors profits, overhead charges, Tender premium to P.R. department also.

3.  In the reference 5th read above orders were issued permitting 16.5% overhead charges for PMGSY Phase VI works which includes 10% contractors profit + overhead charges + 1.4% VAT subject to no tender premium of 5% normally permissible and no cost escalation.

4.  During the review meeting it was pointed out that the different rates and different specifications within P.R. & R.D. Department and within P.R. & R&B Department are causing difficulties in eliciting the response from the contractor, which is resulting in slow progress of works. Therefore it has been proposed for all the tender works of Panchayat Raj department to follow the specifications of Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India which are by and large, same as manual specification of Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (MORTH). Apart from following a uniform specification of MORD to all the tender works in Panchayat Raj Department, it is proposed that the allowances given by R&B Department are also applicable to the works for P.R. Department including PMGSY. In case of Panchayat raj Department works the MORD standards shall apply with regards to specifications as well as use of machinery and the MORD rates are contigent to following of the standards as above.

5.  Government have examined the matter carefully and hereby accord permission for adoption of 16.5% overhead charges which includes contractors profit at 10% for all the tender works of Panchayat Raj including PMGSY by following the specifications of MORD, subject to following conditions:
  1. In framing data adopting MORD specifications, the component of overhead charge is included at the prescribed percentages. This component of overhead charges includes Sales Tax/VAT. Hence, this component of Sales Tax/VAT shall be deducted in the overhead charges in the data but, shall be separated and shown in Part-B of the estimate. The VAT component so deducted should not be less than the reimbursable amount.
  2. A condition shall be included in the agreement that the VAT component loaded in the estimate shall be added in each bill of the contractors who opt for composition scheme and recovered.
  3. In respect of those contractors, who do not opt for composition scheme, the VAT component loaded in the estimate shall not be released to them with their bills and VAT, however, shall be recovered and for the recovery made, a deduction certificate shall be issued, based on which they have to claim adjustment through their returns submitted to their respective assessing authorities.
6.  Government hereby also order to allow 5% tender premium on par with TR&B Department in second or subsequent tender calls only.

7.  The price escalation orders issued vide reference 4th read above are also applicable to all the tender works including PMGSY.

8.  The above orders shall be implemented subject to the following conditions.
  1. These orders are applicable with prospective effect only.
  2. Already settled/closed cases shouldn’t be reopened for applying the orders of this G.O.
  3. Price escalation clause should be allowed carefully duly ascertaining the fulfillment of all the aspects of quantity, quality and contractual obligations.
  4. No cases of revised administrative sanction will be entertained.
  5. The concession given under this G.O. are not applicable to the works entrusted on nomination basis.

9.  This order issues with the concurrence of Finance (Expdr.P.R.& RD) Department vide their U.O.No.04947-A/88/A1/Expdr.P.R.& R.D./08,dt.19.2.2008.

10.  The Engineer-in-Chief (P.R.) shall take necessary action accordingly.


(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH)


DR.V.P.JAUHARI
SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
To
The Engineer-in-Chief(P.R.), Hyderabad.
Copy to:
Accountant General, A.P,,Hyderabad.
Finance (Expdr.P.R.) Department.
P.S. to M(P.R.)/Spl.C.S.
Sf/Sc.

//FORWARDED::BY ORDER//

SECTION OFFICER
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Deductions from works bills

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
ABSTRACT

PR&RD DEPT – Issues of Builders Association of India (AP Center) related to civil works in PR Department – Certain Guidelines - Orders – Issued.

*************************************************************
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PROGS.II) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No.23
Dated.11.02.2014

Read the following
  1.  G.O.Ms.No.1, Finance Dept (W&P), dt.25.2.2012
  2.  G.O.Ms.No.94, I&CAD (PW-COD) Dept, dt.1.7.2003
  3.  G.O.Ms.No.57 PR&RD (progs.II) Dept, dt.19.2.2008
  4.  Representation of Builders Association of India (AP Centre), dt.13.9.2012
  5.  Memo No.16274/Progs.II(1)/2013, dt.26.6.2013
  6.  From the ENC, PR Lr.No.T2/DEE-5/Builder’s Association/2013, dt.21.10.2013
***
ORDER:

In the ref 4th read above, Builders Association of India has submitted certain issues requesting to the Government to consider the same and issue suitable orders.

  1. Price Escalation
  2. Seinorage Charge
  3. Tender Premium
  4. VAT 5%
  5. Labour Cess
  6. Completion report
  7. Over Head Charges
  8. EOAT
  9. Price Escalation Provisions
  10. Tender Participation
  11. Income Tax
  12. Sand
  13. Payment of Bills

2.  In the ref 5th read above, Government has requested the Engineer-inChief, PR to examine and to furnish a detailed report on the representation of Builders Association of India. The ENC, PR has submitted a detailed report along with the minutes of Board of Chief Engineers held on 19.6.2013 and requested to take necessary action in the matter.

3.  Government have convened a meeting on 17.10.2013 with the Engineer-in-Chief, PR/ Chief Engineers of PR Dept/ representative of Finance Dept/ Members of the Builders Association of Inida in the chambers of Hon’ble M(PR&RWS), the issues have been discussed as put-forth by the BAI in detail.

4.  Government after careful consideration of the issues of the Builders Association and hereby clarified on the following:-

i. Price Adjustment:-

Price Adjustment whether it is increase or decrease in the costs after deducting the basic 5%.

(contd---2)
 Pages: 1 2 3
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Suspension of Upa-Sarpanch orders set aside by High Court of Telangana

Telangana High Court
Miriyala Mahendar vs The State Of Telangana on 16 December, 2020
Bench: Challa Kodanda Ram
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
WRIT PETITION No. 12659 of 2020
Between:
Miryala Mahendar

... Petitioner


and

State of Telangana,
Rep.by its Principal Secretary,
Panchayat Raj & Rural Development &
others.

...Respondents
Date of Judgment Pronounced: 16-12-2020
Submitted for Approval: The Hon'ble Sri Justice CHALLA KODANDA RAM 1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers No may be allowed to see the judgments ? 2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals 3. Whether His Lordship wish to No see the fair copy of the Judgment ? _____________________________ (CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J) 2
* The Hon'ble Sri Justice CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No. 12659 OF 2020
Date 16.12.2020
Between:

Miryala Mahendar          ......Petitioner

and

State of Telangana,
Rep.by its Principal Secretary,
Panchayat Raj & Rural Development &others. ...Respondents


Counsel for the petitioner   : Sri Venkateswarlu Gummadavelly

Counsel for the respondents : GP for Panchayat Raj
     Sri G. Narender Reddy, Standing Counsel


THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No. 12659 of 2020

ORDER:

Petitioner challenges the order dated 15.07.2020 which suspended him from the post of Upa Sarpanch of Perkapally Gram Panchayat for a period of six months. The said order was made under Section 37(5) of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018 by the 3rd respondent - District Collector.

The petitioner was issued a show cause notice alleging that he, being the Upa Sarpanch and authorised to sign Cheques as co- signatory, failed to sign the cheques relating to payment of salaries of Multi-purpose workers, and electricity consumption charges, which act amounts to non-compliance of his legitimate duties and also not in the interest of the gram panchayat; and therefore, sought explanation as to why he should not be kept away from the affairs of the gram panchayat. The petitioner is stated to have submitted his explanation. After consideration of the explanation and also after considering the report of the District Panchayat Officer, he was stated to have suspended for a period of six months.

In the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, the petitioner averred that false charges were framed against him as he questioned the unauthorised and illegal activities of the Sarpanch and also due to political rivalry. It is also averred that out of five material documents which he sought under the Right to Information Act, only three documents were furnished which is violation of the principles of natural justice in the conduct of inquiry.

The 6th respondent - Panchayat Secretary filed a counter- affidavit on behalf of the gram panchayat denying the averments of the petitioner. It was asserted that the gram panchayat convened a meeting of the Committee with seven Ward Members and passed a Resolution to make a complaint to the District Collector with respect to non-cooperation of the petitioner. Pursuant to the complaint, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the 3rd respondent by issuing the show cause notice and as per the record, the petitioner had apparently not filed any explanation even after lapse of one month. It is further asserted that under Section 70 of the Act, cheques of the gram panchayat have to be signed by the Sarpanch and the Upa Sarpanch and, under Section 71, it is the duty of the gram panchayat to make payment of salaries, allowances, etcetera; and once the gram panchayat passes a Resolution, the petitioner being Upa Sarpanch and a Member of the Body cannot refuse to carry out the said Resolution. It is also stated that in the present case, the petitioner failed to sign the cheques which amounts to non-implementation of the Resolution of the gram panchayat. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition.

At the time of admission, interim order was made on 18.08.2020, suspending the impugned order, on the ground that no notice was issued to the petitioner under Section 37(5) and there was no assertion in the impugned order that suspension is pending investigation into omissions and refusal of the petitioner to carryout the orders of the government.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, though not pleaded, submits that Upa Sarpanch is not the Sarpanch for all practical purposes and thus, Section 37(5) has no application to the Upa Sarpanch.

Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the District Collector, drawing attention to definition of 'Sarpanch' enumerated under Section 2(39), would submit that there being no separate procedure for election of 'Sarpanch' and 'Upa Sarpanch', Upa Sarpanch also gets governed within the definition of 'Sarpanch', in terms of Section 15(9) as he is also an elected member. There is no distinction between 'Sarpanch' and 'Upa Sarpanch' except with respect to the functions to be discharged by them and both are responsible for discharge of their respective functions on behalf of the gram panchayat. The learned Government Pleader further submits that this Court not being an appellate authority and in view of there being no explanation of the petitioner to the show cause notice, the decision of the Collector does not warrant interference.

Heard learned Standing Counsel for the gram panchayat Sri G. Narender Reddy.

Having regard to the respective submissions, at the outset, it may be noted that the petitioner having failed to avail the opportunity of submitting his explanation to the show cause notice had practically disabled himself to canvass anything with respect to the merits of the matter on facts. That being only ground, the learned counsel for the petitioner having realised the same, and further considering the fact that this Court has time and again held that this Court is not the Appellate Authority over the affairs of the gram panchayat or on the orders passed under Section 37(5) raised the issue of in-applicability of Section 37(5) on the ground that the petitioner is 'upa sarpanch'.

One may notice the definition of 'Sarpanch' in Section 2(39) which reads thus:

"Sarpanch" means the Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat elected under Section 15." Under the scheme of Panchayat Raj Act, the gram panchayat consists of elected members, co-opted members and a Sarpanch. From among the elected members, in terms of Section 15(9), one of the members shall be elected to be the Upa Sarpanch by the gram panchayat. While 'Sarpanch' gets elected directly by the voters, 'Upa Sarpanch' gets elected by the ward members. The training to be undergone and the functions to be discharged by the Sarpanch and the Upa Sarpanch delineated under the Act is same. There is no separate provision made dealing with 'Upa Sarpanch'. Further, it may be noted that the purpose of suspension power to be exercised by the Collector under Section 37 is to ensure uninterrupted smooth functioning of the gram panchayat and not as a punishment. This view was taken by this Court in Writ Petition No. 12778 of 2020. Hence, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the provision under Section 37(5) does not apply to Upa-Sarpanch is liable to be rejected.

However, in the facts of the present case, for one instance of non-cooperation of signing cheques, suspension of the petitioner for a period of six months cannot be said to be justified in the context of Section 37(5). Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the District Collector for consideration afresh with respect to the desirability of suspending the petitioner for a period of six months.

The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the miscellaneous Petitions, if any stand closed.

----------------------------------- CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J 16th December 2020 LR Copy be marked. ksld In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh WRIT PETITION No. 12659 of 2020 Between: Miryala Mahendar ... Petitioner and State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development & others. ...Respondents Date of Judgment Pronounced: 16-12-2020 Submitted for Approval: The Hon'ble Sri Justice CHALLA KODANDA RAM 4. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers No may be allowed to see the judgments ? 5. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals 6. Whether His Lordship wish to No see the fair copy of the Judgment ? _____________________________ (CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J) * The Hon'ble Sri Justice CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 12659 OF 2020 % Date 16.12.2020 Between: # Miryala Mahendar ... Petitioner and State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, p
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Friday, January 14, 2022

Election of Upa-Sarpanch in Telangana State

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT(PTS.III)DEPARTMENT

RULES-Telangana Panchayat Raj(Conduct of Elections of Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat) Rules,2018-Issued.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT(PTS.III)DEPARTMENT


G.O.Ms.No.25
Dt:19.5.2018.

Read

From the Secretary, TSEC, Hyd., Lr.No.146/TSEC-PR/2018, Dt: 2.4.2018
******

ORDER:

The appended Notification will be published in extra ordinary issue of the Telangana Gazette.


(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF TELANGANA)
VIKAS RAJ
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT(FAC)

To
The Commissioner, Printing,Stationery & Stores Purchase (Printing wing)
Chanchalguda, Hyd., (with a request to publish the Notification in the Telangana Gazette and send 500 copies)
The Secretary,Telangana State Election Commission, 1st Floor,DTCP Building,opp PTI Building,AC Guards, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Employment, Telangana,Hyderabad.
All the District Collectors in the State
All the Chief Executive Officers of Zilla Praja Parishad
All the District Panchayat Officers in the State
Copy to:
The Engineer-in-Chief(Panchayat Raj)Telangana, Hyderabad.
The Director, Local fund audit, Hyderabad.
The Law(C)Department
All Head of Departments
All Departments of Secretariat
All Sections in the PR&RD Department
The PS to Minister(Panchayat Raj)
Sf/sc
//FORWARDED::BY ORDER//

SECTION OFFICER

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (i) of sub-section (2) of section 286 read with sub-sections (9) and (10) of Section 15 of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018 (Act No.5 of 2018) the Governor of Telangana hereby makes the following Rules relating to conduct of election of Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat.

RULES
1. Short title:- These rules may be called the Telangana Panchayat Raj (Election of Upa-Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2018.
2. Definitions :-
  1. In these rules unless the context otherwise requires,
    1. “Act” means the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018;
    2. “Form” means a Form appended to these rules;
  2. The words and expressions used but not defined in these rules shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Act.
3. Convening of Special Meeting:-
  1. The election of the Upa-Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat shall be held in the Office of the Gram Panchayat on the same date on which the results of the ordinary election of the Gram Panchayat are published at a meeting of the Members specially convened for the purpose notice for which shall be given in Form – I:

    2. Provided that the District Panchayat Officer or any person authorised by him may direct that the meeting for the election of the Upa-Sarpanch shall be held at such place as may be specified by him, other than the office of the Gram Panchayat if its office is located in the house of any Member of the Gram Panchayat or if it is not convenient to hold the meeting in the office of the Gram Panchayat:

    Provided further that if for any reason the election of the Upa-Sarpanch is not held on the date aforesaid the special meeting for the election of Upa-Sarpanch shall be held on the next day whether or not it is a holiday observed by the Gram Panchayat:

    Provided also that the State Election Commissioner may from time to time, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, direct or permit the holding of the election of the Upa-Sarpanch on any other day.

  2. The meeting referred to in sub-rule (1) shall be presided over by the Returning Officer appointed for conducting ordinary election to the office of Sarpanch and Ward Members of the Gram Panchayat.
4. Quorum:- The first and second meetings specially convened for the election of UpaSarpanch, shall not be held, unless there be present within one hour from the time appointed for the meeting not less than one-half of the total number of members of the Gram Panchayat inclusive of its Sarpanch. However, the subsequent Meeting or Meetings convened for this purpose, shall be conducted, even if there is no quoram. EXPLANATION: In determining 'one-half of the total number of Members' under this sub-rule, any fraction arrived at, shall be construed as one.
5. Manner of Election:-
  1. Any Member may propose only one of the Members for election as Upa-Sarpanch duly seconded by another. The names of all the candidates duly proposed and seconded shall be read out by the Presiding Officer of the meeting. The contesting candidates shall be given thirty minutes time for withdrawal.
  2. If there is only one validly nominated candidate she/he shall be declared to have been elected.
  3. If there are two or more candidates, an election shall be held by show of hands and votes of the members present at the meeting shall be taken.
  4. The Presiding Officer shall, thereafter, record the number of votes polled, for each such candidates ascertained by show of hands. He shall then announce the number of votes secured by each candidate and shall declare the candidate who secured the highest number of votes, as elected.
  5. In the event of there being an equality of votes among the candidates, the Presiding Officer shall draw lots in the presence of the members and the candidate whose name is first drawn shall be declared to have been duly elected.
  6. The candidate as also the Sarpanch shall also be entitled to vote at the election.
6. Record of Proceedings :- Immediately after the meeting, the Presiding Officer shall -
  1. prepare a record of the proceedings at the meeting and sign it, attesting with his initials every correction made therein and also permit any member present at the meeting to affix her/his signature to such record if she/he expresses her/his desire to do so; and
  2. publish a notice signed by self stating, the name of the person elected as Upa-Sarpanch on the notice board of the Gram Panchayat if there is one or in a conspicuous place in the village and send a copy of such notice to the District Panchayat Officer, District Collector, Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and State Election Commission. A copy of such notice shall also be given to the candidate who is declared elected as Upa-Sarpanch.
7. Filling up of casual vacancy:-
  1. A casual vacancy in the Office of UpaSarpanch shall be filled within a period of six months from the date of occurrence of such vacancy:

    Provided that, before a casual election of Upa-Sarpanch is held, every casual vacancy in the office of an elected member of a gram Panchayat shall be filled. However, in the event of a vacancy in the office of an elected member of Gram Panchayat occurs for any reason after the issue of Upa-Sarpanch casual election notification by the State Election Commission, the election to the office of Upa-Sarpanch shall not be stalled and shall be conducted as per the schedule.

  2. A meeting of the Gram Panchayat for the purpose shall be convened by a person authorised by the District Panchayat Officer who shall be not below the rank of Revenue Inspector. Notice of the day and hour of meeting shall be given at least three clear days prior to the day of meeting in Form – II.
  3. Rules 4, 5 and 6 shall apply for filling up of a casual vacancy also in all other respects.
VIKAS RAJ
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT(FAC)

FORM – I
NOTICE OF THE MEETING FOR THE ELECTION OF UPA-SARPANCH,GRAM PANCHAYAT
[See Rule 3(1)]

Notice is hereby given to Sri/Smt/Kum …………….. Sarpanch / Member of the Gram Panchayat ………………….who has been declared as such in the ordinary election held today that a special meeting of the Sarpanch and Members of the Gram Panchayat will also be held today i.e., on (date) …………. at (time) …………… at (place)………………….. for the election of the Upa-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat.

If for any reason, election is not held on the aforesaid date, it shall be held at (time)…………………… on the next day i.e, on (date)……………….whether or not it is a holiday observed by the Gram Panchayat. The Sarpanch / Member is requested to make it convenient to attend the meeting.


Place:
Signature of Returning Officer

Date:
Designation.


To
Sri / Smt/ Kum……………………….
Sarpanch / Member of Gram Panchayat.
……………………………….


FORM – II
[See Rule 7 (2)]
NOTICE OF THE MEETING FOR CASUAL ELECTION OF UPA-SARPANCH,GRAM PANCHAYAT

Notice is hereby given to Sri/Smt/Kum ………………. Sarpanch / Member of Gram Panchayat…………………. that a meeting of the Sarpanch / Members of Gram Panchayat will be held at (time ) ………. on (date) ………….. at (place)………………. for the election of Upa-Sarpanch to fill up the casual vacancy.

If for any reason, election is not held on the aforesaid date, it shall be held at the same time on the next day whether or not it is a holiday observed by the Gram Panchayat. The Sarpanch / Member is requested to make it convenient to attend the meeting.

Place:
Signature.

Date:
Designation


To
Sri / Smt./ Kum………………………
Sarpanch / Member of Gram Panchayat.
………………………………….
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Featured Post

Central Finance Commissions since Independance

Finance Commission Year of Establishment Chairman Operational Duration First 1951 K.C.Neyogi 1952-57 Second 1956 K. Santhanam...

Popular Posts